Posts: 9,152
Threads: 578
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
16
Should Linux Lite 3.x series have an Anti Virus bundled?
I ask this because this OS aims to meet the expectations of Windows users. You're welcome to have your say.
Thank you for participating :)
Jerry
Posts: 530
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
0
I personally don't worry about this after using Linux for the last few years. When I first started however it was something I did worry about. I think it would probably be a good option to be able to be added from Lite Software to ease the minds of new users.
“I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” - Thomas Edison
Posts: 227
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
I voted "no" because 1) most malicious code is written for Windows (not that Linux can't be zapped but less likely) and 2) unless there's only 1 AV prog available, I'd like to be able to choose which one I want.
Posts: 508
Threads: 55
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
0
Have never used anti-virus in Linux in five years.
Assuming it would be in lite software then the user has the choice whether to install or not.
Dont see a problem.
Jocklad
Posts: 9,152
Threads: 578
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
16
Good idea avj, I've added a new Poll option.
Posts: 656
Threads: 106
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
0
I wouldn't use it. Might make new users from Windows nervous if installed by default. Having in Lite Software would be good for paranoid coming from Windows. ;)
![[Image: EtYqOrS.png%5D]](http://i.imgur.com/EtYqOrS.png%5D)
Left Mac OS X for Linux in Jan 2014
Posts: 499
Threads: 21
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
3
The main question is whether running an AV software is (meanwhile) recommended for an average Linux Lite user. Not whether someone coming from Windows expects this software.
IF it's not necessary - I still don't use one - I would rather educate the people who worry than install software that continuously eats up system resources.
Therefore:
1. inform/ educate - if appropriate even on the getting started screen
2. offer an AV software via Lite Software
My 2c :)
Posts: 227
Threads: 33
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
0
Since the 3rd option was added after I voted, can my vote be changed to that, please? While I still don't think AV is needed, it would be nice to have it available.
Posts: 1,486
Threads: 96
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
0
Like
@avj
I think for peace of mind having it available via Lite Software would be good.
If you are in a complete Linux setup, your risk is low,
But if you are still in a mixed/dual boot Linux/Windows set-up,
you may inadvertently copy something from Linux to Windows,
if you have a shared/common data/file area.
Upgrades WIP 2.6 to 2.8 - (6 X 2.6 to 2.8 completed on: 20/02/16 All O.K )
Linux Lite 3.0 Humming on a ASRock N3070 Mobo ~ btrfs RAID 10 Install on 4 Disks :)
Computers Early days:
ZX Spectrum(1982) , HP-150 MS-DOS(1983) , Amstrad CPC464(1984) , BBC Micro B+64(1985) , My First PC HP-Vectra(1987)
Posts: 62
Threads: 3
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
0
Made available through Lite Software would be good. It makes it easily accessible for those that want it then.
![[Image: X5qGkCg.png]](https://imgur.com/X5qGkCg.png)
![[Image: 0op1GNe.png]](https://i.imgur.com/0op1GNe.png)
![[Image: LgJ2mtP.png]](https://i.imgur.com/LgJ2mtP.png)
![[Image: vLZcFUE.png]](https://imgur.com/vLZcFUE.png)
![[Image: lrUHro3.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/lrUHro3.jpg)
